Bicameral parliament: are Armenia and Diaspora ready for this move?

There are apprehensions that involvement of Diaspora representatives in the parliament may cause new contradictions and a split among Diaspora Armenians.

Diaspora Minister Hranush Hakobyan’s recent statement that Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan plans legislative changes to involve Diaspora representatives in the Armenian parliament caused hot debates, dividing the Armenian public into supporters and opponents of the idea.

PanARMENIAN.Net - “The Republic of Armenia plans to amend its constitution in order to create a new legislative upper house - a Senate - that would include representatives from the Diaspora,” Minister Hakobyan said in Los Angeles January 30.

The statement was followed by discussions about the true reasons for such a move and its advisability. Certainly, no political force in Armenia can openly oppose strengthening of ties with Diaspora. However, engagement of Diaspora in domestic political processes aroused indignation of a part of Armenia’s population, specifically opposition.

According to oppositionists, the idea suggests President Sargsyan’s intention to regain prestige, which was badly damaged after signature of the Armenian-Turkish Protocols.

Opposition insists that people living in other countries can’t impose their rule on Armenia.

“The idea is risky. Formation of bicameral parliament in Armenia will require lengthy public consultations, discussions and professional studies, amendments to the country’s constitution being a serious step,” Heritage party member Larisa Alaverdyan said.

According to ARF Dashnaktsutyun representative Armen Rustamyan, it’s important to create a format allowing Diaspora’s participation in resolving issues crucial to the whole Armenian nation. “However, focusing on a single option should be avoided,” he said, advising flexible approach to the idea. “It’s important that the idea should not be discredited,” Rustamyan said.

Editor-in-chief of Azg paper, chairman of Armenakan-Ramkavar Azatakan party Hagop Avedikian said that the idea of a unified legislative body binding Diaspora Armenians was voiced back in 1970s.

Diaspora Armenians welcome the idea on the whole. “Armenia is the homeland of all Armenians. We welcome the idea although it’s unclear what the mission of the structure will be and what political forces of Diaspora will be represented in it,” an Armenian entrepreneur from Sweden, Vahan Chanoian said.

For his part, head of Hovnanian International, Vahakn Hovnanian hailed the idea as a strategy aimed to preserve the Armenian identity. “Armenians of Diaspora could share their experience and best traditions,” he said.

Assessing the idea of closer cooperation between Armenia and Diaspora, it’s worth noting that the Armenian population is not ready to integrate Diaspora representatives in the governing bodies. The fact is that people living abroad will have difficulties to understand the essence of political processes in Armenia. Thus, there are apprehensions that involvement of Diaspora representatives in the parliament may cause new contradictions and a split among Diaspora Armenians.

Hayk Khalatyan / PanARMENIAN News
 Most popular in the section
The idea of involving the Armenian Diaspora in elections is not new; it was first voiced following the adoption of the Law on Dual Citizenship.
According to some Armenian experts, the May 6 elections became the “swan song” for ANC and Levon Ter-Petrossian.
Unable to unite, the Armenian opposition will logically proceed to nominate several candidates at 2013 presidential vote.
We faced war and hunger, bread coupons and 30 minutes of electricity daily, and political instability in the past 21 years.
 At focus
Vatican position on Armenian Genocide unchanged: official

Vatican position on Armenian Genocide unchanged: official Turkish media reports suggesting that the Vatican has stepped back from its position on the Genocide are totally false, Balayan said.

 More articles in this section
Baku fires howitzers amid global community’s idle sighs Realizing the mediators and world powers cannot be relied on, Armenia pledged to punish Azerbaijan itself.
Armenian elections 2012: political hypocrisy Since the very start of its election campaign Prosperous Armenia showed obvious signs of political amnesia.
Election outcomes: RPA’s victory and ANC’s downfall Parliamentary race yielded unexpected results, with ruling coalition’s crushing victory recorded as the most significant outcome.