U.S. Supreme Court stalls Obama climate plan

PanARMENIAN.Net - President Barack Obama's plans to regulate emissions of carbon dioxide from U.S. power plants have been stalled by the U.S. Supreme Court.

According to BBC News, the court ruled that the president's Clean Power Plan could not go forward until all legal challenges were heard.

Designed to cut U.S. emissions by 32% by 2030, the scheme put huge emphasis on a shift to renewable energy. It formed the key element of the U.S. pledge at UN climate negotiations held in Paris in December last year.

Introduced by the president last August, the plan set carbon reduction goals for each state and it was up to the states themselves to come up with proposals to meet those goals.

A group of 27 states, utilities and coal miners sought to block the proposal in the courts. They argued that the plan was an infringement on states' rights.

An initial attempt to halt the implementation of the plan until legal challenges were heard was thrown out by a U.S. appeals court in Washington in January.

However the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to suspend the plan pending the outcome of the litigation, what could have significant implications for the president's attempt to cut down on carbon, the BBC says.

Under the Clean Power Plan, individual states were due to submit their proposals on how to meet the CO2 restrictions by September this year. That date will be missed.

It is unlikely that all the legal questions over the future of the Clean Power Plan will be resolved before President Obama leaves office next January. The ruling will be seen as a major embarrassment for President Obama, who helped craft a new global agreement on climate change at UN sponsored talks in Paris in December. What will worry the White House more is the division of the court along ideological lines, with conservative justices all supporting the stay while the liberal justices opposed, the BBC says.

If these divisions hold, the Clean Power Plan may suffer further setbacks in the Supreme Court which may ultimately render it useless. If that was to happen, the ability of the U.S. to live up to its commitments under the Paris Climate Agreement would be in serious doubt.